American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North Americaby Colin Woodard
Why is the United States of America such a fractious and divided nation? Woodard claims it is because we are not one nation, one culture, but a federation of ten different regional cultures. (The eleventh nation is the relatively new First Nation in Canada. While he occasional references Canada, the book is primarily about the US. )
The problem goes back to the early European settlements in North America, which were begun by several different countries - Spain, France, Holland and Britain - in widely separated areas and at different times in history. He bases his sociological ideas on the doctrine of "first viable settlement" which posits that the culture of a region takes on the characteristics of the first group to establish a self-perpetuating society, no matter how small the original group had been.
His regional American cultures are, in order of settlement:
- El Norte (on both sides of the present American-Mexican border)
- New France (Quebec & Southern Louisiana)
- Tidewater (Virginia, Maryland & part of Delaware)
- Yankeedom (New England plus areas later settled by Yankees)
- New Netherland (NYC & northern New Jersey
- The Deep South (North Carolina to east Texas)
- The Midlands (Pennsylvania and parts of the Midwest)
- Greater Appalachia (the "Borderlanders" from the Blue Ridge on westward into Texas)
- The Left Coast (Washington, Oregon & Northern California)
- The Far West
There is a lot of information in this book, more than I can explain in a review, but it's quite readable and I found it interesting and persuasive. For one thing, his regional culture theory explains why parts of the country are what they are and why they cause so much amusement and/or consternation in the rest of us. Most important, he goes into what each culture values in terms of the balance of freedom and order, individual rights versus communal needs. And it explains why it is so hard for us to find a compromise position on much of anything. If there is one overriding theme, it is the historical struggle between Yankeedom and the Deep South, both aided by shifting alliances with the other regions, for control of the nation, which culminated in the Civil War but still goes on today.
Some of this was familiar territory, as Woodard builds on earlier works like David Fischer's Albion's Seed, which I read and enjoyed years ago. But I learned some new things as well, for instance, the reasons for the (to me) odd combination of Libertarianism and Corporatism found in the Far West. (Basically, the climate and geography of the region were too rugged for individuals to truly succeed on their own. Corporate and government intervention was required to make the land livable.)
As a history nut, I found the book both fascinating and insightful. The one time the nation really came together as one was during World War II, but even there, reasons for supporting the war varied. I think this passage is very telling:
Borderlanders fought for the traditional Scots-Irish reason: to avenge an attack by defeating their enemies on the field of battle. The Tidewater and Deep Southern elite... wished to uphold U.S. "national" honor and to defend their Anglo-Norman brethren acrosee the sea. Pacifist Midlanders backed the war as a struggle against military despotism, while Yankees, New Netherlanders, and Left Coasters emphasized the antiauthoritarian aspect of the struggle. Residents of El Norte and the Far West embraced a war that showered their long-neglected regions with federal largesse.What a war, something for everyone!
I had wondered if our present culture wars were mostly a generational problem that would go away once the Baby Boomers died off. After all, we are a generation of Happy Warriors. But it appears the problem is of much longer standing. Woodard offers no solution to the problem, for there is no easy answer here, even acknowledging that the breakup of the country is not unthinkable. A greater understanding of our differences could help, especially if we can recognize that those who don't agree with us are not necessarily idiots or scoundrels, only people with differing values and beliefs. The trick is finding ways to compromise on policy without compromising principles.
In any case, Woodard urges an open and honest political debate, concluding with: "The United States needs its central government to function cleanly, openly, and efficiently because it's one of the few things binding us together." Unfortunately, that is not working optimally, as we've seen in the last few days. Our federal government is currently as dysfunctional as I've ever seen it, and I've been around for a while!
Happy New Year!
* Map Photo by Sean Wilkinson, Sean Wilkinson Design, can be better viewed on the Washington Monthly website where Woodard wrote an article or at the author's website.
Click icon for more
book review blogs